How fantastic.
My question question comes from the fact that I am a little naive about some aspects of behavior, but as a guide I didn't have the time or access to do lots of research. I worked for about seven years as a guide on
NamibRand Nature Reserve, and had a great opportunity to get to know a little about Oryx behavior.
One aspect of Oryx behavior that was always of interest to me was about male dominance, and I started making some notes and really watching what was going on. It was this paradox mentioned in "The Behavior Guide to African Mammals" about some Oryx bulls appearing to be territorial and others seemingly non-territorial bulls appearing to still be involved in the breeding. See page 129, bottom-right.
I could talk a lot about what I had observed here, but that may be inappropriate, especially since my observations were mostly done on game drives in the desert, and not really in any controlled, measured way. But I think they may be worthwhile enough to post here.
To give you the gist of my question, here is what I made from what I saw. I was lucky enough to witness both very, very dry years (2002 we had under 25mm rain on our part of the reserve, 2004 rainy season again, though we had one out of season rain event in June), and very, very green years, like last year and 2006.
If you watch Oryx, everything changes. Everything. They go deeper in the dunes, the babies are born at different times, they simply act different totally. It may seem obvious, but with Mountain Zebra, Springbok and everything else the difference was not so obvious. So my question became, "Is there a difference in male dominance behavior during 'good' years and 'bad' years." I would love to have a good comment on that.
I would suggest that during very dry years the territorial bulls hang on to their territories, but don't participate much in breeding, and actually avoid bulls crossing their territories, perhaps not to be challenged. Even if they do fight, and get wounded, they then just disappear to the quieter parts of their territories, which in the Namib are massive, and sit it out. We watched one male sit out about four months with a bad injury, but no other bulls took over his territory (he was on an ATV route through the dunes, so we saw him, but he stayed away from Oryx). It appears to me that a challenger must challenge to satisfy itself that it has actually taken over the territory. A bit of thumb suck, but I would explain this behavior by saying that there is benefit for the territorial bulls to hold onto their territories during those dry years, but they are weaker because of not moving more. The bulls that move around have access to better resources during those dry times...simply from moving, and therefore during those times, they dominate.
Then, when it is greener and (if my thumb-suck is right) access to resources is no longer a divider, then the territorial bulls are king and territoriality becomes stronger even than condition.
I know this sounds a little far fetched, but I believe that there is something to these observations. In the Namib where I worked, Oryx were our 'big game' if you would. The other thing is that observation of behavior becomes so much easier because the animals don't disappear in the bush (desert=no bush). So if a bull chases a bull, you can watch the interaction as long as your guests allow. Also, without the pressure of needing to chase lions and other hairy/scary, we had a much more relaxed guiding style that emphasized really observing closely. But, conversely, without the 'mega' stuff, we also had to 'know our stuff' a little better.
I am sure there is good literature on the topic, but, like I said, I have not had access to it. I have tried to look it up on the Internet, but haven't managed to find a good discussion on it. An opportunity to have someone like Richard comment on it, would be really wonderful.
I just want to add that I am aware that these kinds of behavior can be very misleading to observe in the fashion that we observed them. I have seen that the four or five bulls we got to know the best all behave totally differently from each other, so you would need a good sample size and a good amount of time to draw these sorts of conclusions in a scientific manner.
I would not suggest this idea to try to convince anyone...I am just asking a question. One thing we observed that favors the long holding of territories was the fact that some bulls held there territories for the full seven years that I was there! Which amazed us, but there was no doubt about it.